Astronics (NASDAQ:ATRO) and Moog (NYSE:MOG.B) Head-To-Head Review
by Amy Steele · The Cerbat GemAstronics (NASDAQ:ATRO – Get Free Report) and Moog (NYSE:MOG.B – Get Free Report) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.
Volatility & Risk
Astronics has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Moog has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Analyst Ratings
This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Astronics and Moog, as reported by MarketBeat.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Astronics | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3.17 |
| Moog | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 |
Astronics currently has a consensus price target of $74.17, suggesting a potential upside of 8.41%. Given Astronics’ stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Astronics is more favorable than Moog.
Earnings & Valuation
This table compares Astronics and Moog”s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Astronics | $862.13 million | 3.41 | $29.36 million | $1.70 | 40.24 |
| Moog | $3.86 billion | 3.17 | $235.03 million | $11.76 | 32.89 |
Moog has higher revenue and earnings than Astronics. Moog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Profitability
This table compares Astronics and Moog’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Astronics | 8.40% | 67.69% | 14.23% |
| Moog | 8.73% | 17.67% | 7.94% |
Institutional and Insider Ownership
56.7% of Astronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.1% of Moog shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.9% of Astronics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Moog shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Summary
Astronics beats Moog on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Astronics
Astronics Corporation, through its subsidiaries, designs and manufactures products for the aerospace, defense, and electronics industries in the United States, rest of North America, Asia, Europe, South America, and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Aerospace and Test Systems. The Aerospace segment offers lighting and safety systems, electrical power generation systems, distribution and seat motions systems, aircraft structures, avionics products, system certification, and other products. This segment serves airframe manufacturers (OEM) that build aircraft for the commercial, military, and general aviation markets; suppliers to OEMs; and aircraft operators, such as airlines; suppliers to the aircraft operators; and branches of the U.S. Department of Defense. The Test Systems segment designs, develops, manufactures, and maintains automated test systems that support the aerospace and defense, and mass transit industries, as well as training and simulation devices for commercial and military applications. It serves OEMs and prime government contractors for electronics and military products. Astronics Corporation was incorporated in 1968 and is headquartered in East Aurora, New York.
About Moog
Moog Inc. designs, manufactures, and integrates precision motion and fluid controls and systems for original equipment manufacturers and end users in the aerospace, defense, and industrial markets worldwide. The company's Aircrafts Controls segment offers primary and secondary flight controls for military and commercial aircrafts; aftermarket support services; and ground-based navigation aids. Its Space and Defense Controls segment provides controls for satellites, space vehicles, launch vehicles, armored combat vehicles, tactical and strategic missiles, security and surveillance, and other defense applications; and gun aiming, stabilization, and automatic ammunition loading for armored combat vehicles. This segment also offers steering tactical and strategic missiles; and designs, builds, and integrates weapon stores management systems for light attack aerial reconnaissance, ground, and sea platforms. The company's Industrial Systems segment provides systems for applications in injection and blow molding machinery, metal forming presses, and heavy industry customers in steel and aluminum production; and supplies solutions for power generation applications, electromechanical motion simulation bases, medical training simulators, and custom test systems and controls. This segment also offers systems and components for applications in oil and gas exploration and production; components for wind turbine applications; and components and systems for diagnostic imaging CT scan medical equipment, sleep apnea equipment, oxygen concentrators, infusion therapy, and enteral clinical nutrition. The company was founded in 1951 and is headquartered in East Aurora, New York.