Trump moves to fire labor stats chief over ‘rigged’ job numbers claim

ERIC LEE/THE NEW YORK TIMES

President Donald Trump takes questions from reporters at the White House in Washington, on July 30. Following the release of weak jobs numbers on Aug. 1, Trump claimed without evidence that the data were “manipulated” and that he was firing Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was confirmed on a bipartisan basis in 2024.

President Donald Trump unleashed his fury about weakness in the labor market today, saying without evidence that the data were “rigged” and that he was firing the Senate-confirmed Department of Labor official responsible for pulling together the numbers each month.

In a long post on social media today, Trump said he had directed his team to fire Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was confirmed on a bipartisan basis in 2024.

McEntarfer was fired today and informed of her firing, according to a person familiar with the matter who declined to be named.

Trump’s post came after the bureau released monthly jobs data showing surprisingly weak hiring in July and large downward revisions to job growth in the previous two months. Economists widely interpreted the report as evidence that Trump’s policies were beginning to take a toll on the economy, though the president insisted in a subsequent post that the country was “doing GREAT!”

Lori Chavez-DeRemer, the labor secretary, echoed Trump’s concerns about McEntarfer in a post on social media. She said William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as acting commissioner during the search for McEntarfer’s replacement.

McEntarfer was appointed to her post by President Joe Biden in 2023 and confirmed by the Senate in 2024, after a long career at the Census Bureau and other agencies, where she served under presidents of both parties, including Trump.

Don't miss out on what's happening!

Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!

Email Sign Up
By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser's and Google's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.

William W. Beach, who led the bureau during Trump’s first term, criticized the move to fire McEntarfer today.

“It’s unfortunate,” he said. “This could set a precedent where bad news on many different fronts is a reason for dismissing a person.”

Beach, who was appointed by Trump in 2019 and remained in the role for the first two years of the Biden administration, said he had never felt pressure to manipulate the data under either president. Even if there were such pressure, he said, there is “no way” the commissioner could interfere in the revisions process, which is conducted by career employees.

Trump and his top aides have made a habit of attacking government agencies, researchers and watchdogs when they have produced findings that the president does not like. That has led to concerns that Trump could seek to interfere with the operations of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other statistical agencies, particularly if the economy begins to take a turn for the worse.

Until now, however, most experts on the statistical system said they remained confident in the data produced by the agencies and had seen no evidence of political interference in their operations. Current and former agency staff members consistently echoed that message — in part, they said, because they trusted McEntarfer and her counterparts at the other major statistical agencies to protect their independence.

“If that pressure got too great, you would see people resigning rather than shape the numbers,” Beach said.

Economists across the ideological spectrum today said Trump’s move to oust McEntarfer was likely to erode public confidence in the data published by the administration.

“If you want people to stop trusting the numbers coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, firing the person who is confirmed by the Senate to make sure those numbers are trustworthy is a real good way to do it,” said Martha Gimbel, the executive director of the Budget Lab at Yale, who served in the White House under Biden.

McEntarfer could not immediately be reached for comment. The Department of Labor and the Bureau of Labor Statistics did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Only hours earlier, Stephen Miran, the chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, offered a much different explanation for the jobs revision.

In an appearance on CNBC, he said much of the change was the result of “quirks in the seasonal adjustment process” and even the president’s own policies, particularly on immigration, potentially affecting hiring numbers for May and June. He made no mention of any concerns about manipulated data as he sought to recast the slowdown in July as a “pretty decent” jobs report.

Michael Strain, an economist at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said: “President Trump is completely wrong in asserting there’s been any sort of anti-Trump bias in the labor market data. I think that assertion is wholly unsupported.”

Strain said that government data is revised frequently, and that doing so reflected a “standard” practice to ensure its quality. In this case, he acknowledged that the change was “historically large” but “doesn’t smell fishy,” citing a range of possible causes, from declining response rates to underfunding at federal agencies.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2025 The New York Times Company

See more:National newsPolitics

80 Comments
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines. Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.
Please log in to comment