What is the Tarun Tejpal Goa resort elevator rape case? Explained in 5 points

Tehelka founder-editor Tarun Tejpal has been convicted in a rape case by the Goa bench of the Bombay High Court. The HC overturned an earlier trial court order in a case pertaining to the sexual assault of a junior team member by Tejpal in an elevator of a Goa resort in 2013.

Nearly 13 years ago, Tehelka founder-editor Tarun Tejpal was accused of sexual assault of a younger colleague in an elevator of a five-star hotel elevator. The case has come full circle with the ruling of the Goa bench of the Bombay High Court on Thursday. A division bench of the high court overturned Tejpal's 2021 acquittal by a trial court, and convicted him of sexual assault. The court sentenced a 10-year imprisonment and gave him a two-week deadline to surrender.

The High Court held Tejpal guilty under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), but deferred arguments on the quantum of sentence until later in the day. The court also declined to take him into custody immediately, even as the prosecution sought his arrest pending sentencing.

Tejpal, who was present in court, appealed for leniency after the verdict was read out. "I am 62, and I believe I am a victim. I have a wife, and that's not much else to say. All that I can say is we can go and appeal. Please be lenient with me," he said.

What was the case all about? Here's a revisit in five points.

1. WHO IS TARUN TEJPAL AND WHAT WAS TEHELKA?

Tarun Tejpal was one of India's most influential journalists and the founder-editor of investigative news magazine Tehelka, which he launched in 2000.

The news magazine Tehelka rose to national prominence through its undercover sting operations, most notably Operation West End in 2001, which exposed alleged corruption in defence deals by secretly filming politicians, bureaucrats and military officials accepting bribes.

The expose shook the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led NDA government and established Tehelka as one of India's leading investigative publications.

The Guardian of the UK then called Tejpal "India's most feted journalist", according to a BBC News report from 2021.

Beyond journalism, Tejpal authored three novels and was regarded as one of the country's best-known editors. His career, however, came crashing down in 2013 when allegations of sexual assault by a junior colleague emerged.

2. WHAT IS THE GOA ELEVATOR SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE?

The case is related to a sexual assault incident that took place on November 7 and 8, 2013.

During Tehelka's annual ThinkFest at the Grand Hyatt hotel in Bambolim, Goa, a young woman journalist working with the Tehelka magazine accused Tejpal of sexually assaulting her twice inside a hotel elevator.

In a complaint to then Managing Editor of the magazine Shoma Chaudhury, the survivor, who was a young woman journalist, alleged that Tejpal lured her into the lift, manipulated its controls to keep it "in circuit", confined her inside and sexually assaulted her despite repeated objections.

The complaint became public and triggered nationwide outrage. The National Commission for Women (NCW) took suo motu cognisance, Goa Police registered an FIR, and the investigation was handed over to the Crime Branch.

Tejpal was arrested on November 30, 2013, after his anticipatory bail plea was rejected. A 2,846-page chargesheet accused him of offences, including rape, wrongful confinement, sexual harassment and assault.

3. WHAT DID TEJPAL SAY ON THE SEXUAL ASSAULT ALLEGATIONS IN 2013?

Soon after the allegations became public, Tejpal wrote to Shoma Chaudhury admitting to what he described as "misconduct" and announced that he would recuse himself from the magazine for six months.

In the letter, Tejpal called the incident "a bad lapse of judgment" and "an awful misreading of the situation", saying he had already apologised unconditionally to the survivor.

However, as the criminal investigation progressed, Tejpal changed his legal stand. He denied the allegations of rape, maintained that the interaction was consensual, and urged investigators to examine the CCTV footage, claiming it would establish the "accurate version" of events.

Throughout the trial in the lower court, Tejpal pleaded not guilty and also alleged that the prosecution was politically motivated.

4. WHAT DID THE TRIAL COURT RULE IN THE TEJPAL RAPE CASE?

After an in-camera trial that began in 2018, the Additional Sessions Court in Mapusa, Goa, acquitted Tarun Tejpal of all charges on May 21, 2021.

The trial court held that the prosecution had failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted Tejpal of offences, including rape, sexual assault, wrongful restraint and wrongful confinement.

In its 527-page judgment, the court questioned the prosecution's evidence and highlighted what it described as inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony. It also relied on CCTV footage, electronic records and witness statements while concluding that the prosecution had failed to establish guilt.

Tejpal welcomed the verdict, saying the previous seven-and-a-half years had been "traumatic" for him and his family. In a statement, he said they were trying to "reclaim our broken lives" after the allegations had affected every aspect of their personal, professional and public lives.

Tejpal also paid tribute to his lawyer, Rajeev Gomes, who had died of Covid-19 days before the judgment.

The trial court verdict sparked widespread criticism. The Goa government challenged the acquittal before the Bombay High Court, arguing that the trial judge had misread the evidence, overlooked material facts, and adopted an erroneous appreciation of the complainant's testimony.

The prosecution contended that the trial court had relied on stereotypes and irrelevant considerations while assessing the survivor's conduct, and sought reversal of the acquittal.

5. WHAT HAS THE HIGH COURT RULED? WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR TEJPAL?

The Goa bench of the Bombay High Court on Thursday (August 6) set aside the trial court judgment of 2021, and convicted Tejpal in the sex assault case.

The division bench judges held Tejpal guilty of rape and sexual harassment under Sections 376(2)(f) and 376(2)(k), along with Sections 354A and 354B of the IPC.

While Section 376(2)(f) criminalises rape by a person in a position of trust or authority, Section 354A criminalises sexual harassment. Section 354B criminalises assault or use of criminal force against a woman with the intent to disrobe her.

The division bench of the HC sentenced 10 years to life imprisonment for Tejpal.

Tejpal's lawyer informed the court that he would challenge the conviction before the Supreme Court and sought a stay on the judgment. The prosecution, represented by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, opposed the request and argued that Tejpal should be taken into custody pending sentencing.

- Ends