Critical Comparison: Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGR) versus Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN)

by · The Markets Daily

Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN – Get Free Report) and Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGR – Get Free Report) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gogoro has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Rivian Automotive and Gogoro, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Rivian Automotive571502.37
Gogoro10001.00

Rivian Automotive presently has a consensus price target of $19.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.28%. Given Rivian Automotive’s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Rivian Automotive is more favorable than Gogoro.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Rivian Automotive and Gogoro”s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rivian Automotive$5.39 billion3.66-$3.65 billion($2.25)-6.05
Gogoro$281.48 million0.14-$79.97 million($3.16)-0.85

Gogoro has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rivian Automotive. Rivian Automotive is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gogoro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Rivian Automotive and Gogoro’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Rivian Automotive-45.88%-69.68%-23.09%
Gogoro-16.98%-41.32%-7.86%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.2% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of Gogoro shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Gogoro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Rivian Automotive beats Gogoro on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Rivian Automotive

(Get Free Report)

Rivian Automotive, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles and accessories. The company offers consumer vehicles, including a two-row, five-passenger pickup truck under the R1T brand, a three-row, seven-passenger sport utility vehicle under the R1S name. It provides consumer services, such as digital financing and leasing, telematics-based insurance, vehicle maintenance and repair services, software services, and charging solutions. In addition, the company designs, develops, manufactures, and operates the Rivian Adventure Network Direct Current fast chargers, and offers access to Combined Charging Standard, as well as FleetOS, a proprietary, end-to-end centralized fleet management subscription platform. Further, it offers Rivian Commercial Van platform for Electric Delivery Van with collaboration with Amazon.com, Inc. The company sells its products directly to customers in the consumer and commercial markets. Rivian Automotive, Inc. was founded in 2009 and is based in Irvine, California.

About Gogoro

(Get Free Report)

Gogoro Inc. provides battery swapping services in Taiwan, India, and internationally. It also develops Swap and Go battery system that delivers full power to electric-powered two-wheelers. In addition, the company offers battery swapping technology in the form of hardware, software, and service, including Gogoro Smart Batteries, GoStation, Gogoro Network Software & Battery Management Systems, Smartscooter, GoReward, and related components and kits. The company was incorporated in 2011 and is based in Taipei, Taiwan.