The case stemmed from an executive order Trump signed when he took office that ended birthright citizenship.

The Supreme Court ruled that lower courts cannot issue nationwide injunctions on executive orders, like Trump's attack on birthright citizenship.

Solicitor General compares nationwide injunctions against executive actions to "nuclear weapons".

The highest court in the land is forsaking courageous judges who follow the law, and the rest of us.

The Supreme Court has limited the authority of individual district court judges to issue nationwide injunctions, in a decision that could benefit President Donald Trump.

The US Supreme Court dealt a blow to the power of federal judges by restricting their ability to grant broad legal relief in cases as the justices acted in a legal fight over President Donald Trump's bid to limit birthright citizenship.

WASHINGTON >> The U.S. Supreme Court dealt a blow today to the power of federal judges by restricting their ability to grant broad legal relief in cases as the justices acted in a fight over President Donald Trump’s bid to limit birthright citizenship, ordering lower courts that blocked his policy to reconsider the scope of their orders.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority curtailed lower courts’ power to block the President's policies nationwide.

The US Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling, granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of three nationwide injunctions issued by federal judges in three states that halted enforcement of his birthright citizenship plan.

Trump hailed the ruling as "amazing" as it stands to roll back dozens of orders against his administration.

U.S. birthright citizenship: U.S. Supreme Court curbs power of lone federal judges to block executive actions, hands President Donald Trump a major victory by

In a 6-to-3 decision split along ideological lines, the Court ruled that lower federal judges had overstepped their authority by imposing nationwide injunctions

The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory by curbing the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions.

The ruling clears a major hurdle to President Trump’s agenda and could reshape American citizenship, at least temporarily, as lower court challenges proceed.

Supreme Court restricts universal injunctions in 6-3 ruling, handing Trump a key legal win and reshaping judicial limits on executive actions all over.

The Supreme Court ruled that federal judges can’t issue nationwide injunctions, backing Trump’s immigration stance. But enforcement of his birthright citizenship order remains unclear as lower courts reassess tailored rulings.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday handed a win to the Trump administration by allowing it for now to take steps to implement its proposal to end automatic birthright citizenship. In a 6-3 vote, the court granted a request by the Trump administration to narrow the scope of nationwide injunctions imposed by judges so that they apply only to states, groups and individuals that sued. That means the birthright citizenship proposal can likely move forward at least in part, although the specifics remain to be seen and it could still be blocked by courts on other grounds. NBC news reported the ruling immediately sparked a response from plaintiffs who have sued to block the executive order, with their lawyers vowing to continue the legal fight. One group of plaintiffs filed an amended lawsuit within hours after the ruling. It has long been widely accepted, including by legal scholars on left and right, that the Constitution’s 14th Amendment confers automatic citizenship to almost anyone born in the United States.…

The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday in a case involving birthright citizenship by curbing the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide, changing the power balance between the federal judiciary and presidents. The 6-3 ruling, authored by conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett,…

Washington: A divided Supreme Court on Friday ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision left

A divided Supreme Court has ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision leaves unclear the fate of President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship.

The dispute before the court was prompted by an order President Trump signed on his first day back in the White House.

A divided Supreme Court on Friday ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision left unclear the fate of President Donald Trump's restrictions on birthright citizenship.

Donald Trump has hailed a "giant win" after the US Supreme Court voted to curb the power of federal juges to block his exective orders.

The outcome was a victory for the Republican president, who has complained about individual judges throwing up obstacles to his agenda.

United States President Donald Trump has hailed the Supreme Court decision over his Executive Order purporting to end the right to birthright citizenship.

Here's what to know about birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court's ruling and what happens next.

Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) claimed Friday on CNN's "Inside Politics" that President Donald Trump "doesn't understand" the Supreme Court ruling that a single judge cannot block a presidential order is a procedural win, foreshadowing a win on the substance of the case. | Clips

The Supreme Court delivered significant victories for President Donald Trump in its term that ended Friday.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in the "birthright citizenship" case that lower courts cannot simply issue nationwide injunctions.

The Supreme Court has imposed new limits on the power of district-court judges. Here’s what that means for the Trump administration.

The court didn’t rule on the legality of Trump’s order, but it didn’t have to.

According to CNN, this decision could have far-reaching consequences for future administrations, regardless of political affiliation

The divided court is issuing decisions on the final six cases left on its docket for the summer, including those that are emergency appeals relating to Trump’s agenda.

The Hispanic Caucus is raging over a SCOTUS ruling issued on Friday that will limit district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions.

Supreme Court justices lambasted each other's arguments in a ruling over an effort by the president to deny birthright citizenship to children born to immigrants.

The Supreme Court's ruling today hands Trump the kind of power his predecessors could only dream of - and blocks federal judges from halting his orders, even if they're unconstitutional

Hail to the Supreme Court for definitively slapping down the lower-court judges who’ve been issuing nationwide injunctions against President Donald Trump’s orders and actions.

"The court has essentially kneecapped lower courts from stopping this administration when it engages in lawless and unconstitutional behavior," NYU professor Melissa Murray says The post Supreme Court’s Birthright Citizenship Ruling Is ‘Enormous Win’ for Trump and ‘Death Blow to the Rule of Law,’ MSNBC Legal Analyst Says appeared first on TheWrap.