The jury in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking trial has begun its deliberations, after hearing dueling narratives from prosecutors and defence lawyers last week about whether the music mogul forced his former girlfriends to take part in drug-fueled sexual performances.

Jury deliberations in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’s sex-trafficking trial hit a snag on their first day over concern that a juror couldn’t follow the judge’s instructions.

They are sifting through the sometimes graphic and emotional testimony about Combs’ propensity for violence and his sexual predilections.

The judge overseeing Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking trial on Monday said he would remind jurors of their obligation to deliberate and follow his instructions about the law, after the jury warned that one member of the 12-juror panel may not be able to follow the judge's guidance. U.S. District Judge Arun…

Jurors started to deliberate Monday in Sean “Diddy” Combs' sex trafficking case, weighing charges that could put him in prison for life.

NEW YORK (AP) — Jury deliberations got underway on Monday in Sean “Diddy” Combs’ federal sex trafficking trial and hit a snag almost as soon as they started. But, by the end of the day, jurors indicated they were making progress weighing complex charges that could put the hip-hop mogul in prison for life.The first day of deliberations saw a flurry of notes from the jury and Combs and his supporters bowing their heads in prayer in the courtroom — but no verdict. The jury of eight men and four women are sifting through seven weeks of sometimes graphic and emotional testimony about the rap, fashion and reality TV impresario ’s propensity for violence and his sexual predilections, including drug-fueled sex marathons dubbed “ freak-offs ” or “hotel nights.”About an hour in, the foreperson reported that a juror might be having trouble following the 61 pages worth of instructions the judge had just read to them.“We are concerned (the juror) cannot follow your honor’s instructions,” the foreperson said in a note to Judge…

The jury deciding the sex-trafficking case was interrupted for an hour when the foreperson told the court that a juror was having trouble following the judge’s instructions.

On the final day of closing arguments, the defence accused the prosecution of "badly exaggerating" the evidence, saying it was confusing threesomes with racketeering.