Critical Contrast: China Coal Energy (OTCMKTS:CCOZY) versus Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY)

by · The Cerbat Gem

Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGYGet Free Report) and China Coal Energy (OTCMKTS:CCOZYGet Free Report) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Magnolia Oil & Gas and China Coal Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Magnolia Oil & Gas071012.67
China Coal Energy00014.00

Magnolia Oil & Gas presently has a consensus price target of $31.71, suggesting a potential upside of 14.35%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas’ higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than China Coal Energy.

Dividends

Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. China Coal Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Coal Energy pays out 21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Magnolia Oil & Gas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. China Coal Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Magnolia Oil & Gas and China Coal Energy”s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.31 billion5.01$325.25 million$2.2812.16
China Coal Energy$20.59 billion0.95$2.02 billion$3.987.43

China Coal Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Magnolia Oil & Gas. China Coal Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magnolia Oil & Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Magnolia Oil & Gas and China Coal Energy’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Magnolia Oil & Gas28.77%21.04%14.46%
China Coal EnergyN/AN/AN/A

Volatility and Risk

Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Coal Energy has a beta of -0.31, indicating that its share price is 131% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats China Coal Energy on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

About Magnolia Oil & Gas

(Get Free Report)

Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp. engages in the acquisition, development, exploration, and production of oil and natural gas properties. It operates assets located in the Eagle Ford Shale and Austin Chalk formations in South Texas. The company was founded on February 14, 2017 and is headquartered in Houston, TX.

About China Coal Energy

(Get Free Report)

China Coal Energy Company Limited primarily engages in the coal production and trading and coal chemical businesses in the People's Republic of China and internationally. The company offers polyolefin, methanol, urea, and other coal chemical products. It is also involved in the coal mining equipment manufacturing, pithead power generation, and other activities. The company was founded in 2006 and is based in Beijing, the People's Republic of China. China Coal Energy Company Limited operates as a subsidiary of China National Coal Group Co., Ltd.