Is The New ‘Avatar: Fire and Ash’ Movie All Hype But No Heat? [Review]

The Avatar franchise remains a towering achievement in world-building and technical innovation. But story-wise, this one falls a little flat.

There’s no question about it: James Cameron knows how to build worlds. 

Avatar: Fire and Ash is visually colossal. Meticulously detailed, technically astonishing, and crafted with the kind of confidence only a filmmaker of Cameron’s stature can afford. 

Every frame is engineered to impress, and yet, when the film finally ends (after nearly three and a half hours) the overwhelming feeling isn’t awe — it’s fatigue.

For all its spectacle, Fire and Ash is curiously forgettable.

This third instalment pushes the Avatar saga into new elemental territory, introducing fire as part of the environment and ideology. 

Enter the Mangkwan clan, led by Varang (Oona Chaplin), a fierce and commanding presence who rules a volcanic region shaped by ash, heat, and a belief in survival through dominance.

Conceptually, this is one of the film’s most interesting turns.

Rather than framing Pandora as a unified moral front, Fire and Ash hints at internal fracture — a shift from the familiar coloniser-versus-colonised dynamic toward something more complicated: what happens after survival, and who gets to decide how resistance should look.

It’s a promising idea, but one that the film only partially commits to. Varang herself is compelling, yet the Mangkwans remain frustratingly underexplored.

Their worldview is sketched in broad strokes, leaving the sense that we’re being introduced to a striking aesthetic rather than a fully realised culture. 

For a film so interested in expansion, it sometimes feels reluctant to linger where it matters.

Visually, Fire and Ash is relentless.

Cameron’s technical mastery remains undeniable, but the sheer volume of digital detail begins to work against the film. 

Pandora, once defined by its sense of wonder, now feels overfamiliar — beautiful, but increasingly static. 

The film moves constantly, jumping from set piece to set piece, yet it rarely feels like it’s advancing the story or its ideas. Escalation comes easily, progression does not.

This sense of emotional distance is especially apparent in the film’s handling of Kiri.

Positioned as a child of Eywa herself and uniquely connected to Pandora’s spiritual core, Kiri should represent one of the franchise’s most profound narrative threads. 

Instead, her arc feels oddly underdeveloped. 

Moments that are meant to tap into something sacred and transcendent, particularly her confrontations with Eywa, register as strangely hollow. 

Despite the visual grandeur, these scenes feel more synthetic than sacred. It feels like a missed opportunity to explore belief, connection, and mystery with genuine emotional depth.

The film’s focus on the younger generation also feels uneven.

While the intention is clearly to shift the saga forward, many of these characters struggle to leave a lasting impression. 

Spider (Jack Champion) is meant to serve as a bridge between worlds, but his performance often feels unconvincing, and sometimes even distracting, occasionally pulling my focus out of the film rather than drawing it in.

Despite its epic runtime, Fire and Ash never quite earns the weight it seems to be reaching for.

Major confrontations come and go, but they rarely land with lasting impact. 

With two more sequels already confirmed, it becomes difficult to believe that anything here is truly irreversible. The stakes feel oddly muted for a film so determined to present itself as monumental.

What Fire and Ash ultimately underscores is a growing tension in contemporary blockbuster cinema: the widening gap between technological ambition and emotional engagement.

Cameron has access to cutting-edge tools and wields them with remarkable confidence.

His stance against AI is much-needed in the times we live in. The performance capture technology and use of real people as actors in Avatar is, to me, the best thing about the films.

Because it gives the artists behind the film full credibility for everything that we see on screen. And ultimately, that is something that should be celebrated despite how we feel about the film.

As conversations around technology and AI in filmmaking continue, what is clear is that technical capability is not a substitute for good storytelling. 

When spectacle isn’t anchored by story and character, it risks becoming hollow, no matter how extraordinary it looks.

The Avatar franchise remains a towering achievement in world-building and technical innovation.

But Fire and Ash feels like a tipping point where visual excess overwhelms narrative urgency, and where spectacle alone is no longer enough. 

It’s a stunning movie. It’s just unfortunate that it never feels like more than that.

Avatar: Fire and Ash opens in cinemas nationwide on 18 December 2025.

Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.