JD Vance outlines plan for Ukraine that favors Russia
by New York Times · Star-AdvertiserKENNY HOLSTON/THE NEW YORK TIMES
Vice President JD Vance speaks with reporters in Agra, India after he and his family visited the Taj Mahal, today. Vance demanded, today, that Russia and Ukraine agree to an American peace proposal that would “freeze the territorial lines” in the three-year war, force Kyiv to accept the annexation of Crimea by Russia, and block Ukraine from becoming part of the NATO alliance.
LONDON >> Vice President JD Vance today called on Ukraine to accept a U.S. peace proposal that closely aligns with long-standing Russian goals, including a “freeze” of territorial lines in the three-year war, acceptance of the annexation of Crimea by Russia and a prohibition on Ukraine becoming part of the NATO alliance.
It was the first time a U.S. official had publicly laid out a plan to end the war that favors Russia in such stark terms.
A peace plan that leaves Russian forces deep inside eastern Ukraine would be welcome news in Moscow. President Vladimir Putin has said for almost a year that he would accept a ceasefire in which Ukraine withdraws troops from the four regions that Russia has claimed as its own and drops its aspirations to join NATO.
The comments by the vice president appeared designed to increase pressure on President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine, who has long refused to accept Russian’s occupation of his country’s lands, including the seizure of Crimea in 2014 and territory taken by Russia after it invaded Ukraine in early 2022.
In a second blow to Zelenskyy, President Donald Trump lashed out at the Ukrainian president Wednesday afternoon, writing on Truth Social, his social media site, that “he can have Peace or, he can fight for another three years.”
Vance, speaking during a trip to India, said the United States would “walk away” from the peace process if both Ukraine and Russia refused to accept the U.S. terms. But Zelenskyy was clearly the target.
Don't miss out on what's happening!
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It's FREE!
Email Sign Up
By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser's and Google's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
“We’ve issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and the Ukrainians, and it’s time for them to either say yes or for the United States to walk away from this process,” Vance told reporters. “The only way to really stop the killing is for the armies to both put down their weapons, to freeze this thing and to get on with the business of actually building a better Russia and a better Ukraine.”
The vice president’s comments came just hours after Zelenskyy said his country will never accept Russia’s 2014 occupation of Crimea as legal, adding that doing so would violate Ukraine’s constitution. He also said Ukraine could not accept any prohibition against becoming part of NATO.
“There is nothing to talk about. This violates our constitution. This is our territory, the territory of the people of Ukraine,” Zelenskyy told reporters at a news conference.
Today, Yulia Svyrydenko, the Ukrainian economy minister, also vowed that her country “will never recognize the occupation of Crimea.” Writing on the social platform X, she said “Ukraine is ready to negotiate — but not to surrender. There will be no agreement that hands Russia the stronger foundations it needs to regroup and return with greater violence.”
In his statement, Trump accused Zelenskyy of making “inflammatory” statements that he claimed would prolong the war.
“If he wants Crimea, why didn’t they fight for it eleven years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?” Trump wrote. “The statement made by Zelenskyy today will do nothing but prolong the “killing field,” and nobody wants that!”
The threat by Vance to walk away from peace talks were similar to comments last week from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and from Trump, who said in the Oval Office that if the two sides don’t agree quickly to a deal, “we’re just going to say, ‘You’re foolish, you’re fools, you’re horrible people, and we’re going to just take a pass.’”
Today, Vance told reporters in India that under the U.S. proposal, “We’re going to freeze the territorial lines at some level close to where they are today.”
“The current lines, or somewhere close to them, is where you’re ultimately, I think, going to draw the new lines in the conflict,” he added. “Now, of course, that means the Ukrainians and the Russians are both going to have to give up some of the territory they currently own.”
The vice president did not say what territory Russia would have to give up.
Russia currently occupies 18.7% of Ukraine, according to DeepState, an online research group with ties to the Ukrainian army.
A freeze would essentially force Ukraine to surrender huge swaths of land to Russia and would violate the principles of self-determination and borders that has animated the United States and European nations to support Ukraine since Russia’s invasion.
A Kremlin spokesperson today welcomed Vance’s remarks.
“The United States is continuing its mediation efforts, and we certainly welcome those efforts,” Dmitry Peskov, the spokesperson, said. “Our interactions are ongoing but, to be sure, there is a lot of nuances around the peace settlement that need to be discussed.”
The aggressive push for a deal by Trump’s administration is a blow to European leaders, who have spent weeks attempting to shore up Ukraine’s position by brokering peace talks with the United States. The first effort convened last week in Paris and another session was set to start Wednesday in London before Rubio announced he would no longer attend.
Rubio’s decision to cancel caught the British government off guard, according to a British official who said that David Lammy, the foreign secretary, had fully expected the secretary of state in London today.
Lower-level diplomats from Britain, France, Germany, Ukraine, and the United States still gathered for technical talks. But the absence of Rubio or Steve Witkoff, Trump’s chief negotiator with Russia, renewed fears that Ukraine and Europe were being marginalized as the Trump administration seemed to be working primarily with Russia.
Witkoff is scheduled to be in Moscow later this week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.
Andriy Yermak, the Ukrainian president’s chief of staff, arrived in London this morning for the scaled-back talks along with his country’s ministers of defense and foreign affairs.
“Despite everything,” he wrote on X after arriving, “we continue working for peace.”
Even before his comments Tuesday, Zelenskyy had expressed his opposition to the U.S. demands in a conversation with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, according to an official familiar with the conversation. Zelenskyy laid out his positions on Crimea and NATO, the official said, and Rutte later called Trump and conveyed Zelenskyy’s answer.
Instead of participating in a larger meeting, Lammy met one-on-one with the Ukrainian foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, while the British defense secretary, John Healey, met his Ukrainian counterpart, Rustem Umerov. Lammy also dropped in on a lunch that included senior national security advisers from Britain, France and Germany, as well as the Ukrainian delegation and Gen. Keith Kellogg, Trump’s special envoy to Ukraine.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2025 The New York Times Company
46 Comments
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines. Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.
Please log in to comment