Crans-Montana fire: Swiss prosecutor says champagne sparklers likely started deadly blaze

Summary

• Swiss prosecutor says "fountain candles" on champagne bottles caused a deadly fire in a ski resort bar.
• The fire resulted in 40 deaths and over 100 injuries according to Swiss officials, prompting a thorough investigation.
• Investigators are examining the bar's renovations, fire safety systems, escape routes and the number of patrons.

CRANS-MONTANA, Switzerland – A fire that tore through a bar at a Swiss ski resort killing at least 40 people likely started when “fountain candle” sparklers were held aloft too close to the ceiling, the region’s chief prosecutor said on Jan 2.

One of the owners of the ski resort has told Swiss newspaper Tribune de Geneve that the bar complied with regulations and that the bar had been inspected three times in 10 years.

Swiss officials put the death toll at 40
, with more than 100 injured.

Investigators are combing through the blackened ruins of the venue, examining videos on social media and interviewing survivors for clues on how the fire began in the early hours of New Year’s Day in the bar’s basement and spread so fast.

Witnesses have recounted seeing bar staff carrying sparkling fountain candles attached to bottles of champagne. The Valais canton’s chief prosecutor, Beatrice Pilloud, said the sparklers were a leading line of enquiry that looked to be firming up.

“Everything suggests that the fire started from the burning candles, or ‘Bengal lights’, that had been attached to champagne bottles. These went too close to the ceiling,” she told a news conference. “From there, a rapid, very rapid and widespread blaze ensued.”

However investigators are pursuing several hypotheses and no scenario has been ruled out, she added.

Police arrived quickly at the scene according to local residents, but the fire burnt victims so severely that investigators said they would need days to identify the bodies.

So far, officials have only identified a teenage Italian international golfer, Emanuele Galeppini. According to two people familiar with the investigation, some of the victims may be under 16.

Local residents said the bar was popular with young people and the Swiss government said many of the dead were likely youths. Beer and wine can be drunk from age 16 in Switzerland.

Grieving residents continued paying their respects to the victims of the blaze on Jan 2, leaving flowers and tributes nearby, even as police began reopening the area around the cordoned-off bar in the heart of the wealthy mountain town.

Probe focuses on renovations, safety

The probe will focus on previous renovations to the bar and the materials used, the availability of adequate fire extinguishing systems and escape routes, as well as the number of people who were in the bar when the fire started.

Ms Pilloud said the investigators were examining acoustic-dampening foam in the ceiling of the basement to assess whether it complied with regulations, whether officials authorised its installation, and what role it played in the fire’s rapid spread.

The probe will determine if inspectors had carried out annual building inspections, but the town had not raised concerns or reported defects to the canton, Mr Stephane Ganzer, head of security in Valais, told the news conference.

Mr Jacques Moretti, one of the owners of the bar, told Swiss and Italian media on Jan 2 that the renovations had been carried out “in accordance with regulations”.

He told Swiss newspaper Tribune de Geneve that the establishment had been inspected not annually but three times over the past 10 years.

Investigators have interviewed the French couple, who bought the bar in the Crans-Montana resort in 2015, according to the Valais company registry.

Asked if the pair had been instructed not to leave Switzerland, Ms Pilloud said they had not been interviewed under caution, but added: “If there is a flight risk, it is possible for us to take the measures needed.”

Reuters was not able to reach the couple for comment.

Further investigations will determine whether there are grounds for criminal liability involving any individuals, Ms Pilloud added.

“If this is indeed the case and these individuals are still alive, an investigation will be opened against them for negligent arson, negligent homicide, and negligent bodily injury,” the prosecutor said. REUTERS