New Delhi, Jul 30: The Supreme Court today reserved its judgment in a plea filed by Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma, challenging the recommendation made by former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna for his removal over the alleged recovery of unaccounted cash from his official residence in Delhi.   A Bench […]

Addressing arguments challenging the legality of the CJI’s role, the bench noted: “If there is material to believe there is misconduct, the CJI can inform the President and PM.”

Justice Varma argued that the in-house inquiry against him was initiated without a formal complaint and that public disclosure of the allegations subjected him to a media trial

Supreme Court questions Justice Varma's conduct in in-house inquiry, sparking debate on judicial integrity and removal process.

The Supreme Court questioned Justice Varma's challenge to an in-house inquiry finding him guilty of misconduct, citing his delayed objection. The court emphasised the CJI's duty beyond a

Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that even if there have been any lapses in the in-house inquiry procedure in Justice Yashwant Varma's case, the same won't affect the Parliament to take action against the Allahabad High Court judge. India News | Lapses in In-house Probe Won't Affect Parliament's Powers to Take Action: SC Reserves Verdict in Justice Varma Case.