BJP leader and Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis rides a motorcycle during a roadshow for the Nagpur. (File photo: ANI)

BMC Election Results 2026: BJP-Mahayuti Break Sena Fortress – Why Thackerays Crumbled And Cong Couldn’t Break Through

BJP-led Mahayuti swept Mumbai BMC 2026, the Shiv Sena lost strongholds and the Congress struggled to expand.

by · Zee News

BMC Election Results 2026: After more than three decades of Shiv Sena dominance, the 2026 BMC election has handed the reins of civic governance to the BJP-led Mahayuti. This ushers in a new era in Mumbai politics. Beyond the numbers, the results highlight organisational and strategic weaknesses in the Opposition, while showcasing a change in voter priorities toward governance and visible service delivery.

In the 227-ward BMC, the Mahayuti, which comprises of the the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena and Ajit Pawar’s National Congress Party (NCP), has comfortably crossed the majority mark, with the BJP itself emerging as the single largest party.

Contesting along with Raj Thackeray’s Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and other smaller allies, the Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena or Shiv Sena (UBT) lagged far behind. The party lost ground even in traditional strongholds like Dadar, Parel and Lower Parel, where decades of voter loyalty were no match for the Mahayuti’s strong organisational presence.

The Congress won a modest mid-teens number of wards, retaining influence in pockets like Matunga and Chembur but failing to expand its footprint, while the Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi-led All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) made limited inroads in areas such as Byculla and Nagpada. This highlights the fragmented nature of anti-Mahayuti votes.

Ground Strength, Ward-Level Dominance

The Mahayuti’s success rested on organisational depth and disciplined mobilisation. BJP’s booth-level machinery, honed over multiple Lok Sabha and Assembly elections, proved decisive at the ward level, ensuring effective voter contact and turnout management. In wards like Andheri East and Borivali, where local leadership was combined with active booth-level teams, Mahayuti candidates outperformed Opposition rivals by margins of 5-10 percentage points. The Shinde-led Sena added local familiarity and street-level networks, giving the alliance both scale and neighbourhood-level credibility.

Pre-election civic budget analysis showed that nearly 99 percent of development funds were allocated to Mahayuti-controlled wards, creating visible improvements and faster administrative clearances. In redevelopment-heavy wards such as Worli, Lower Parel and Malad, voters rewarded practical results over historical loyalty, helping incumbents consolidate their positions.

‘Triple Engine’ Governance, Voter Appeal

A key narrative was “triple engine” governance. By linking municipal, state and central authorities, the Mahayuti projected continuity, speed and predictability in infrastructure delivery. Metro expansions in Chembur and Andheri, coastal road work along the western suburbs and ongoing housing redevelopment projects in Dadar and Wadala became tangible symbols of performance. Voters in these wards were clearly influenced by visible progress (the combination of development projects and faster civic clearances translated directly into higher vote shares for Mahayuti candidates).

Opposition Struggles, Fragmentation

The Shiv Sena (UBT) and the MVA struggled with internal disagreements and unclear seat-sharing. In wards such as Sion, Kurla and Ghatkopar, overlapping ambitions and mismanaged campaigns allowed Mahayuti candidates to win comfortably. Long-associated with civic power, the Uddhav faction saw its grip loosen due to years of administrative delays and the public split with the Shinde camp. This eroded trust among younger voters in wards like Malad West and Kandivali, who felt little emotional attachment to the Sena’s legacy.

The Congress managed to hold on to a few wards like Matunga and Chembur but could not turn its national-level message into wins at the city level. By contesting independently in several wards, especially in the eastern suburbs, it split votes and made it easier for the Mahayuti to win.

Opposition messaging on fund misuse and institutional bias also struggled to resonate in areas like Dombivli and Mulund, where voters prioritised service delivery over ideological rhetoric.

Voter Behaviour Patterns Across Wards

Data from several wards shows that in redevelopment-heavy and middle-class areas like Worli, Lower Parel, Andheri East and Borivali, Mahayuti candidates won by 5-15 percent. This indicates that voters preferred candidates who delivered visible infrastructure and efficient administration.

In historically Sena-dominated wards like Dadar and Parel, the UBT faction retained only a thin support base, losing ground to Shinde-Sena and BJP candidates.

The Congress performed better in wards with strong local leadership, such as Matunga and Chembur, but these pockets were isolated and insufficient to offset Mahayuti dominance.

2029 Assembly Elections

The 2026 BMC verdict provides a roadmap for 2029 Maharashtra Assembly elections. With control over civic machinery and strong ward-level footholds, the Mahayuti has the advantage of showcasing delivery, consolidating urban voters and expanding influence into previously contested areas.

The Opposition faces the dual task of rebuilding organisation and presenting a united front. For the Congress, avoiding vote splits and investing in strong urban leadership will be crucial to regain lost ground.

Overall, the Mahayuti won because of strong organisation, smart use of resources and a focus on development, while the Opposition was divided. For the Uddhav Thackeray faction and the MVA, the election shows that old loyalties and sentiment are no longer enough to win. The Congress is still present but has struggled to grow its influence in city politics.

As Mumbai moves into a new phase of civic leadership, the balance of power has changed, redrawing the city’s political map and setting the tone for future contests. By prioritising development, efficiency and good administration over ideology, voters will guide campaigns, alliances and election results in the years to come.